0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Yes I know them very well, especially Fred, who away from the hardbat game, plays a pushblock style. I usually beat him very easily, infact he gives up. I don't understand your comment about the top 50, can you explain it again?
Well I doubt that, I really do, It probably was in practice, because the scenario would not happen in real TT. There are a few younger players who would struggle, at face value, I beat Fred so easily you would not believe it, yet I'm only rankled 79, By 'not believe it' I mean he would not get anywhere near making me sweat. On the current ETTA ranking list, Fred is 178 in the vets, his mens ranking would be considerably lower.
Sunflex are you saying you play better hardbat than inverted compared to others? I'm pretty sure you don't reach world class with inverted do you? Given you are young maybe you have come a long way lately though. What are your TT aspirations these days? Good to hear you are playing at this level even in hardbat!
You know how many of the recent rule changes were partially to increase the length of rallies? Did anyone feel that these rallies are just as short as regular tt?
True hard bat rallies between 2 equal oppenants actually last a long time. On new years eve I played My Friend Andrew, and we used 2 blades with no rubbers. It was hard to win a rally, consistency played a huge part, wth rallies going on for 10 - 20 strokes. I have a feeling that there was more participation when we played with hard bats, the spin wasnt as drastic, and as such made it easier for noobs to play. The introduction of sponge rubber, then long pips slowly weined players away. I could be wrong - it might just be that life is more busy, and the road are more conjested, but the numbers playing competitevely keep dropping, and the spectators are nearly non existant. the non playing spectator juist cant seem to understand the demanding aspects of the sport, let alone the dynamics of spin.
Having another go at your level, this time with hard bat
For the record, Waldner is hardly the typical hard bat player.
I think if Waldner was bothered to beat just about everyone who plays hard bat he would very quickly with a little practice.
I think what BE means is that he doesn't suppose that Waldner worked on his hardbat game a whole lot before the tournament. If he chose to then he would be much better. He probably reads the game better than anyone else in the tournament, but when you are having to manually adjust every shot to allow for a bat you are not used to then things are very difficult however good you are. However if he wanted to it wouldn't take long for him to change this. The key words are 'IF HE WANTED TO' though and I doubt he is bothered.
And Neither an I
Don't think I ever claimed you where? Still, you fail to make sense here. I explained why i thought players at your level would have longer rallies with hard bat, and you went on about Waldner? Now, he is hardly playing at your level, even if I wouldn't be surprised if you thought you could beat him as you love to play against his style. Look at the best hard bat players in the world today, then look at the best hard bat players 30 years ago and you will see that they have shorter rallies today, as they play more offensive today.
I don't know why these discussions have to always come back to a fixation on level like its the only thing that is worth discussing about TT. This thread is about hardbat, specifically about some vids on hardbat that featured Waldner and some other players. I don't see why there needs to be goes had at Rob's level here on it just because he mentions he had some hardbat games. It gets old.
I know you aren't his biggest fan Wiggy, but I know for a fact Denis Neale has beaten top 50 England players with a Hardbat in competitive play, so it is possible.