0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Well, he is. He is a LP blocker who uses his LP to cover the entire table and obviously some people struggle a lot to play against this style.As for this particular clip, yes, Schlager is just fooling around as he would be able to whitewash him at will, but when Oliver asked Schlager to get more serious, Schlager replied, why should I try harder, when you miss all the time as it is? That is exactly the point I've tried to bring forward earlier, don't make it harder then you have to, to win.
Here's another clip. No Offense to Oliver, but from what I can see, players are just simply confused with his style.
And this isn't good because?
My point isthat how does a player get to that supposed level (2200 - 2400) when hecant even return those simple balls.yet I know that any player that plays at my level or Supachops level would never miss those balls.No Offense to Oliver, but from what I can see, players are just simply confused with his style.Now Rob, these 3 statements are yours and they all imply that this player sucks, compared to you. He can't return simple balls, you would NEVER miss those balls and he isn't doing anything at all it just so happen that his opponents miss the table. Now, if the rating 2200-2400 is crash hot or not, I honestly don't know. I know it isn't as good as some of them seem to think, that's for sure, but I still think it is a pretty decent level. The thing with this style is that it requires 2 world class players to look like skill is involved, try finding a video of Fabian Åkerström playing against Dima OvnowayIcanspellhislastname and you'll see. At any other level, this style often makes both players look like basement noobs.I wonder, have you ever played someone with this style? It's not as easy as it looks, but it's not as hard as some loopers make it out to either, but it is incredibly boring, that's for sure!
I wonder, have you ever played someone with this style? It's not as easy as it looks, but it's not as hard as some loopers make it out to either, but it is incredibly boring, that's for sure!
To be completely honest, I would prefer if the minimum friction rule wasn't introduced, cause it was actually a lot easier playing against this style when they used those rubbers then the rubber they currently use.
Don't know how Supachop or JKC would do against him, but I do think both of them would be forced to change their game to play him. Me, I would beat him
Can't speak for Superchop, but I wouldn't be changing my game at all and I can't really imagine him scoring more than 2 or 3 points in any game. If I felt like being mean he may score 0. I do find players of this type very easy to play.
His current rating is 2007, so saying 2200-2400 is kind of flattering to him, since the gap from 2200 to 2400 probably is pretty big.
There is a guy, local to myself and Honey who plays almost identical to this player, his name is Malc Trueman. He does get success, I would think he beats Honey, but against anyone who knows how to read his game he is just nothing, mainly because he can not hit at all with his f/hand, if he could he would be 4x the player because it would be hard to play a system against him.
what was this guys highest ranking acheived at his peak?
All I know is that his team are experts on the expedite system, which apparently gets used very often.
Care to explain what this is?
Better I let gregg explain...http://tabletennis.about.com/od/thelawsoftabletennis/a/expedite.htm
I thought I heard about it before, just couldn't figure out what it was, but as soon as I opened the link, I knew what it was. Now, the question is, do they really get to use it often? Cause I've never seen it used here and I would surely hate to umpire a game where it was introduced.